chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
Welcome to Typemock Community! Here you can ask and receive answers from other community members. If you liked or disliked an answer or thread: react with an up- or downvote.
0 votes
This is a feature I found lacking within AAA the other day when I raised a question (

I think that it would be really great if we can have method parameter checking within AAA, it allows you to use the power of the AAA testing engine and have more exploritary checking of the method body.

I've seen this feature within Rhino Mocks AAA implementation ( ... garguments) and think it'd be a great feature to have in Typemock as well.
asked by slace (2.4k points)

2 Answers

0 votes
Thank you for your suggestion,

I will add your feature request to our backlog
answered by dhelper (11.9k points)
0 votes
I'm putting in my vote for the priority++ on this's a feature of Rhino Mocks that I wish was also present here; however, unlike Rhino Mocks, making it a little more 'clear' as to what to do would be helpful and having a global Arg.Anything that you can use when you just don't care across the board (versus Arg.<T>.Is.Anything which is too verbose)...this will be helpful also when your argument is just a pointer to a function.
answered by boo (21.8k points)