chevron-thin-right chevron-thin-left brand cancel-circle search youtube-icon google-plus-icon linkedin-icon facebook-icon twitter-icon toolbox download check linkedin phone twitter-old google-plus facebook profile-male chat calendar profile-male
Ask a question
The Unit Testing Company
Development Resources
Knowledge Base
Welcome to Typemock Community! Here you can ask and receive answers from other community members. If you liked or disliked an answer or thread: react with an up- or downvote.

Related questions

Isolator inside ASP.NET pages

0 votes
I have been looking a using Isolator AAA syntax for testing sharepoint and it has gone very well.

I have one questions, is it possible to create a fake such as

SPSite fakeSite = Isolate.Fake.Instance<SPSite>(Members.ReturnRecursiveFakes);

inside a ASP.NET web page's constructor. The reason I ask is I was wondering if I could use Isolator to mock out all the MOSS calls made by a webpart, thus allowing it to be run inside a simple ASP.NET web page. This would allow a quick means to check styling/layout.

When I tried it I got the error

Could not load file or assembly 'TypeMock, Version=0.21321.16725.21324, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=545950454d4f434b' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)

This is will TypeMock 5.1.1 installed in the GAC and also the assemblies in the web sites local directory. I know the installation is good as MSTEST can use Isolator based tests without any issue.

I suspect sandboxing issue in the Cassini web server, but the version number in the exception did seem a bit strange.
asked by rfennell
Report User
 (6.8k points)

8 Answers

0 votes
Hi Richard,

Let's take it offline. I sent a separate email regarding this issue.

Hoping to resolve this quickly,
answered by gilz
Report User
 (14.5k points)
0 votes
Goodmoring,

I have the same problem.
Is it possible that you also send me that email? Or post it here?

Greetings
answered by Jo.Inter
Report User
 (180 points)
0 votes
Hi

Sure we will update you as well.
answered by ohad
Report User
 (35.4k points)
0 votes
Hi

It is generally not a good idea to fake things from within your production code (page_load). Instead, you can fake the HTTPContext from inside your test (before initializing your web part to test it)

the reason is that the page_load could be called many times within one test by the ASP.NET runtime, and you only want to "fake" things once in your test.

You might want to take a look at Ivonna, which allows to easily test and fake web forms along with HTTPContext (built on top of Typemock Isolator).
answered by ohad
Report User
 (35.4k points)
0 votes
The only reason I was trying this was try to create a create a 'quick preview' of what a webpart will render as for addressing CSS style sheet etc. issues. This is a test harness where the testing tool is the designers eyes.

The reason for this is that the 'cost' in time to deploy webpart that calls Sharepoint is expensive and I thought to mock out the Sharepoint calls, but leave a 'real web server' to do the HTML /ajax rendering much be the answer. So it is not really production code. I would go as far to say as I doubt it would even be used to handle a post back, just a visual page inspection.

This all said Ivonna does look interesting, but I am not esure it addresses the question of 'are all the text boxes in line'
answered by rfennell
Report User
 (6.8k points)
0 votes
Hi

Now I see what you are trying to do.

The solution you sent reproduces the error you reported.
We are looking into it, I will update as soon as we will find something.
answered by ohad
Report User
 (35.4k points)
0 votes
Hi

We created a patch and sent it.
Please check it out and tell me if it works.
answered by ohad
Report User
 (35.4k points)
0 votes
Hi,

You're patch is working.

Great job.
answered by Jo.Inter
Report User
 (180 points)
...

Products

Help

Company

Community

Contact

Typemock Store (US toll FREE 866–895–4680). Copyright © 2006 Typemock Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use.